Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Daniel-Knoll v. Reid, Larry
as 1:2010cv00439
Petitioner:
Karen Daniel-Knoll
Respondent:
Larry Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Vail et al
as 2:2009cv00306
Plaintiff:
Naathon-Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Eldon Vail and Karen Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv00258
Plaintiff:
Naathon-Ray Johnson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Washington State Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nash v. Vail et al
as 3:2009cv05178
Plaintiff:
Keith L Nash
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Karen Daniels, Robert Story and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2009cv05022
Plaintiff:
Naathon-Ray Johnson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Washington State Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wheaton et al v. Daniels et al
as 5:2007cv00941
Plaintiff:
Gary Roy Wheaton and Nathalie Marlene Jodoin
Defendant:
Karen Daniels and First National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Daniels v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 6:2007cv00361
Plaintiff:
Karen Daniels, Karen Daniels, Karen Daniels and others
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Daniels v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, et al.
as 0:2007cv00378
Plaintiff:
Karen Daniels, Karen Daniels, Karen Daniels and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
