Cases 21 - 30 of 37
WARREN et al v. Holder et al
as 4:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kenneth Warren and Lillian Boyd Warren
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WARREN et al v. Holder et al
as 5:2011cv00258
Plaintiff:
Gordon Kenneth Warren and Lillian Boyd Warren
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Roy Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Warren v. Michael J. Astrue
as 5:2010cv00670
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren
WARREN et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv04750
Plaintiff:
SANDRA WARREN and KENNETH WARREN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Warren et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2009cv00755
Plaintiff:
Sandra Warren and Kenneth Warren
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
WARREN v. HOLDER et al
as 4:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
GORDON KENNETH WARREN
Defendant:
ERIC H HOLDER, JR. and Roy Cooper, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
WARREN et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION et al
as 2:2009cv60053
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WARREN and VANESSA WARREN
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC. DOING BUSINESS AS CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION, BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kenneth Warren, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00447
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren
Perkins v. Sisto
as 2:2008cv02186
Petitioner:
Kenneth Warren Perkins
Respondent:
D. K. Sisto
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warren et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Warren and Vanessa Warren
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
