Cases 21 - 30 of 76
POTTER v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER L POTTER
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anthony Moneyham v. David Ebbert, et al
as 17-2432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY MONEYHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EBBERT, ANDREW EDINGER, FRANCES FISCIANA and others
Defendant:
WAYNE, Optometrist at USP Lewisburg
Moneyham v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, Andrew Edinger, Frances Fisciana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Potter v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 5:2016cv13387
Plaintiff:
Kristina L. Potter
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Reid et al v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2016cv01403
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Reid, Kareem Hassan Milhouse, Eric Houston and others
Defendant:
J. Ebbert, Jeana Mitterling, M. Barner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Potter
as 3:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Patricia L. Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
POTTER v. SUNSATIONS, et al.
as 3:2015cv05730
Plaintiff:
JODY L. POTTER
Defendant:
SUNSATIONS and SUNSATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moneyham v. Potter et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Anthony Moneyham
Defendant:
L. Potter, M Barth and Messenman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Juan Diaz, Jr. v. Director Federal Bureau of Pri, et al
as 14-4676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN DIAZ, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DIRECTOR FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, REGIONAL DIRECTOR and others
Jenkins-Brown v. Liberty Acquisitions Servicing, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01610
Plaintiff:
Andrea Jenkins-Brown
Defendant:
Liberty Acquisitions Servicing, LLC and Thomas L. Potter, IV
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
