Cases 21 - 30 of 246
NAGELMAKER v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
LEONARD NAGELMAKER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DURHAM v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
LEONARD BAKER and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. BAKER et al
as 1:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
LEONARD BAKER and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
DEREK WAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DAVID LAUGHLIN and LEONARD BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, LEONARD BAKER, ZACK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLERVRAIN et al v. DIMON et al
as 1:2021cv02918
Plaintiff:
MANETIONY CLERVRAIN, BRANDAKO, INC and ASHELEY CARMELLE DORSAINVILLE
Defendant:
JAMIE DIMON, ASHLEY BACON, LORI A. BEER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Sewell v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2021cv00700
Plaintiff:
Theodis Sewell
Defendant:
Galipeau, Andrew Pazera, Robinson and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00448
Defendant:
Pearson, E Lowe, Croft and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doolin v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2021cv00429
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Doolin
Defendant:
Jason English, David E Leonard, Mitcheff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
