Cases 21 - 30 of 1,901
Shields v. Warden of USP Lee County
as 7:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
Sonny Adam Shields
Respondent:
Warden of USP Lee County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutton v. Portsmouth City Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Torrey Lee Sutton
Defendant:
Portsmouth City Jail, Lt. Col. Clemons, Major Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shephard v. Diamond et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles O. Shephard
Defendant:
Alexander Diamond, Patricia Diamond, Guy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Monroe v. USA
as 3:2024cv00245
Petitioner:
Arthur Lee Monroe, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Tatum et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Abir Ali
Defendant:
Esker Lee Tatum and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wise v. Leu
as 2:2024cv00171
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Wise and Haley Ann Wise
Respondent:
David Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bonita v. U.S.P-Lee employees et al
as 7:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Eric Bonita
Defendant:
U.S.P-Lee employees, C/O Hamilton, Correctional Officer Pollard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Coles v. Dalton et al
as 7:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Coles
Defendant:
G. Dalton, K. Lewis, Carl Manis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Powell et al
as 7:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
James Lee Huffman
Defendant:
Mjr. Leslie Powell and Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
