Cases 21 - 30 of 1,382
Carson v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2024cv03014
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Carson
Defendant:
Sheriff John Montgomery, All Employees of the Baxter County Sheriff's Department, Officer Alena Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Immel v. Robertson et al
as 3:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Immel
Defendant:
Sheila Robertson and Jacob White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Counts v. Fallis
as 6:2024cv06011
Plaintiff:
Lee O. Counts, Sr.
Defendant:
Detective Mark Fallis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lofton v. Ware et al
as 6:2024cv06009
Plaintiff:
Lee Nicholas Lofton, Sr.
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Joel R. Ware, Food Administrator Jessie Hundhausen, Sheriff Mike McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ingram v. USA
as 6:2024cv06008
Petitioner:
Travis Lee Ingram
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Norris v. Eason et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Norris
Defendant:
Jerome L Eason, Knight, Miesha Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Lee A Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Dolgencorp LLC
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Latasha Lee Dawson
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Meadows et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Brian Lee Walker
Defendant:
Heather Meadows, Christopher Dunn, Phillip E Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
