Cases 21 - 30 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00848
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Carroll v. Jordan et al
as 3:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Major Brad Jordan, Kitchen Staff, Captain Shane Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toxen v. Edmonson et al
as 2:2021cv00038
Defendant:
Indian River Transport Co., John Does 1-3 and Demetrius Levi Edmonson
Plaintiff:
Andrew Toxen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wheeler v. Evans Delivery Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00330
Plaintiff:
Dayon Wheeler
Defendant:
Evans Delivery Company, Inc., Ace American Insurance Company and Levi Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FEDD v. Coleman et al
as 5:2020cv00128
Defendant:
Mr. Cox, Ms. Spears, Ms. Cross and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2020cv03702
Defendant:
Alex Azar, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Centers For Disease Control and Prevention and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Brown, Jeffrey Rondeau, National Apartment Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
National Medical Association, Georgia Chapter, American Academy of Pediatrics, Sabriya A. Linton and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
FEDD v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2020cv00069
Defendant:
Asst. Warden Powell, Doe, VSP Officer Payne and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FEDD v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2020cv00188
Defendant:
POWELL, Officer PAYNE, CHIEF WARDEN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
FEDD v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 1:2020cv00036
Petitioner:
LEVI ARTHUR FEDD
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
