Cases 21 - 27 of 27
CANSEVEN v. JUST PUPS, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv05633
Plaintiff:
BERNA CANSEVEN
Defendant:
JUST PUPS, LLC and VINCENT LOSACCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gray v. Lewis et al
as 3:2013cv04929
Plaintiff:
Bernardos Gray
Defendant:
G. D. Lewis, R. Losacco, M. A. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goolsby v. Lewis et al
as 4:2013cv03366
Plaintiff:
Thomas Goolsby
Defendant:
G. D. Lewis, R. K. Swift, Pugett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gotlin v. Lederman
as 10-3244
Plaintiff:
Dino Brovelli, deceased, and his surviving spouse, Patrizia Siragusa Brovelli, Dino Cattai, deceased, and his survivig spouse and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gary D. Gotlin, as Public Administrator of The State of New York, in and for the County of Richmond, in his capacity as Administrator for the Estates of the following decendents:, Giuseppa Caramanna Bono, deceased, and her surviving spouse and Giuseppe Bono
Defendant:
Irina Grosman, M.D., Joseph Conte, Salvatore Conte, M.D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Gilbert S. Lederman, M.D., Gilbert Lederman, MD., P.C. and Philip Jay Silverman, M.D.
Losacco et al v. Fremont Investment & Loan et al
as 3:2008cv00810
Plaintiff:
Timothy Losacco and Florence Losacco
Defendant:
Fremont Investment & Loan and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Interstate Fire & Casualty Company v. Tree Top Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00260
Plaintiff:
Interstate Fire & Casualty Company
Defendant:
Tree Top Condominium Association, Inc., John Losacco, Harold Cotese and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Gotlin et al v. Lederman et al
as 1:2004cv03736
Plaintiff:
Giuseppa Caramanna Bono, Giuseppe Bono, Dino Brovelli and others
Defendant:
Joseph Conte, Salvatore Conte, John L. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
