Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Grey v. Ocasio
as 5:2017cv00495
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Brandon Grey
Defendant:
M. Ocasio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ocasio v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
as 8:2016cv03350
Plaintiff:
Maria M. Ocasio
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ocasio v. Rhoades et al
as 6:2014cv03552
Plaintiff:
James M. Ocasio
Defendant:
Danny Rhoades, Advanced Corrections Healthcare Services, Wayne Merritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-1346
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ocasio v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv01690
Plaintiff:
Valerie M Ocasio
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Alejandro-Martinez, et al v. Ortiz-Vazquez, et al
as 11-2334
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANGEL L. ALEJANDRO-MARTINEZ, MARIA ANTONIA ORTIZ-SANTIAGO, BENJAMIN APONTE-DOMINGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSE ORTIZ-VAZQUEZ, in his personal capacity and as Director of Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, JOSE F. ORTIZ-VAZQUEZ, in his personal capacity and as Director of Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority, COMPANIA DE AGUAS DE PUERTO RICO, INC. and others
Ocasio-Alvarado v. Astrue
as 11-2006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA M. OCASIO-ALVARADO
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
