Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Ivan Mendez v. Matthew Dean, et al
as 14-1917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant:
MATTHEW DEAN, STEPHANIE ANN TSANTES, ELIZABETH R. MCFARLAN and others
Mendez v. Dean, et al.
as 1:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
Ivan L. Mendez
Defendant:
Matthew Dean, Stephanie Ann Tsantes, Elizabeth R. McFarlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. T. Henley Graves, et al.
as 1:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Wayne T. Baker
Defendant:
T. Henley Graves, Scott E. Bradley and M. Jane Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Conway et al
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Joseph Jackson
Defendant:
James T. Conway, Mark Bradt, D. O'Connell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02208
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Finger v. Schweitzer
as 4:2012cv02332
Petitioner:
Kevin Darrell Finger
Respondent:
M. Jane Schweitzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES v. Fairfax Financial Holding
as 12-3798
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plumbers, Pipefitters & MES Local Union No. 392 Pension Fund, On behalf of Itself and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited, Odysseyre Holdings Corp., V. Prem Watsa and others
Flowers v. Morgan et al
as 1:2012cv01121
Petitioner:
Gearl T. Flowers
Respondent:
Phil Morgan, Attorney General of the State of Delaware and M. Jane Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Warren v. Fischer et al
as 9:2012cv01318
Plaintiff:
Gary Warren
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Jeff McKoy, Brandon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guarneri v. Bradt et al
as 6:2012cv06316
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guarneri
Defendant:
M. Bradt, W. Hughes, S. Dolce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
