Cases 21 - 30 of 42
MADDEN et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00287
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
LEONARD MADDEN and RHONDA MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04363
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HOLLEMAN v. HORTH
as 2:2017cv00512
Defendant:
JANE DOE #1, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HOLLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. LEMMON ET AL
as 1:2017cv03357
Defendant:
GWENDOLYN HORTH, ANTHONY KING, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN KREILEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kreilein v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2017cv00698
Plaintiff:
Alan Kreilein
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Gwendolyn Horth, Charles Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHMOND v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2017cv01923
Defendant:
DREW ADAMS, ROBERT CARTER, ERIC HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWOIN RICHMOND
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437 Federal Election Commission
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
COX v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2017cv00226
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COX
Defendant:
GWEN HORTH, STANLEY KNIGHT, VIRGIL R. MADDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MADDEN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02948
Plaintiff:
CHASIDY MADDEN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
JACKSON et al v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv02551
Defendant:
DREW ADAMS, TRACY BERRY, RANDALL P. GENTRY and others
Plaintiff:
GARY A. JACKSON, SR. and LORIE A. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
