Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Crawford v. Tilley et al
as 5:2018cv00623
Defendant:
John Tilley, Tom Jones, Janice Garth and others
Undetermined:
Dawn Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Jones et al
as 5:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Tom Jones, Madison County, Doug Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendermon v. Madison County Detention Center et al
as 5:2018cv00495
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Sherry Macintosh, Tammy Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Andre S. Pendermon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cates v. Madison County Detention Center
as 5:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
Keith Anthony Cates
Defendant:
Madison County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcoon v. Tucker et al
as 3:2017cv00940
Plaintiff:
Walter Don Marcoon
Defendant:
Randy Tucker, Brian Watson, Madison County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Hanson v. Madison Co Detention Center, et al
as 17-5209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN HANSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MADISON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, MADISON COUNTY, KENTUCKY, DOUG THOMAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Tyler v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 3:2016cv00706
Plaintiff:
Sade Michelle Tyler
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and Madison County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Madison County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2016cv00326
Plaintiff:
Michelle Wilson
Defendant:
Madison County, Kentucky , Madison County Detention Center , Doug Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Madison County Detention Center et al
as 5:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
John Hanson
Defendant:
Madison County Detention Center , Madison County, Kentucky , Doug Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
