Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 21 - 30 of 199
McDaniel v. Kylor We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv01952
Defendant: Sgt. David Kylor
Plaintiff: Glen McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUGH et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv03508
Plaintiff: CALLUM WILSON, MAHEEN SHAFI, CHRISTOPHER ROMANO and others
Defendant: DENNIS WILSON, JANE/JOHN DOES 1-100, RICHARD NICOLETTI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCDANIEL v. MERCK & CO, INC et al
as 2:2020cv01674
Defendant: MERCK & CO, INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MICKESSON CORP.
Plaintiff: GINGER MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUM-BRUNNER v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2020cv00800
Defendant: JUSTINE MCDANIEL, PHILADELPHIA INQUIRER/CEO, CHRISTOPHER KOPECKI and others
Plaintiff: BAUM-BRUNNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROLLING et al v. WAWA, INC.
as 2:2020cv00271
Plaintiff: NICOLE PORTNOY, NAKIA ROLLING, MARCUS MCDANIEL and others
Defendant: WAWA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARKE v. COUNTY OF CHESTER et al
as 2:2019cv03577
Defendant: SERGEANT JOHN MCCRAY, COUNTY OF CHESTER, DEPUTY MARIO DIGUARDI and others
Plaintiff: JAMES E. CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MOOREFIELD et al
as 2:2019cv02891
Defendant: SATELLITE'S, TCB.GOV, NRC.GOV and others
Plaintiff: NEAL D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RUCKER v. MCDANIEL et al
as 2:2019cv00777
Plaintiff: LANCE B. RUCKER
Defendant: DONNA JO MCDANIEL and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02419
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCDANIEL v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv20125
Defendant: MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., MCKESSON CORP and MERCK & CO INC
Plaintiff: LADY MCDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?