Cases 21 - 30 of 42
MOSES v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00134
Respondent:
JEFFREY KRUEGER
Petitioner:
SAMIR YUSEF RAHEEM MOSES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MOSES V. PORTER, et al
as 2:2018cv00076
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT and PORTER
Plaintiff:
SAMIR MOSES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Giger v. Superintendent
as 3:2017cv00262
Petitioner:
Moses Giger
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GRAY v. MOSELY et al
as 1:2017cv00364
Defendant:
JACE DUNDICH, DAVID MOSELY, RENAIRD SANFORD and others
Plaintiff:
SANTANA GRAY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOSES v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv00343
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LORI A. MOSES
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPIEKHOUR et al
as 1:2015cv01146
Defendant:
BOONE COUNTY INDIANA, CAPITAL ONE, CLARK, QUINN, MOSES, SCOTT & GRAHN, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403 Suit to Enforce Federal Tax Lien
DONNELLY v. TIPTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv01136
Defendant:
SCOTT E. BRIDGE, DAVID CAMPBELL, STEVE COX and others
Plaintiff:
HEATHER MARY CHRISTINE DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mosee v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01821
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Plaintiff:
Janice Mosee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hilliard et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01685
Plaintiff:
Hattie Hilliard , Lennel Addison , Sharon Bennett and others
Defendant:
Biomet Inc and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. RICH et al
as 1:2014cv00581
Defendant:
MATT L. DECKARD, KOKOMO TRIBUNE, THOMAS LETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
