Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv00593
Defendant:
Eileen Sykes, Kemba Jones-Ferbos, Mahony Title & Land Services LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lynch et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11773
Plaintiff:
Vincent Modica, Sylvia Mines, Taugh Lynch and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Walker v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01896
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, Randall P. Seidl and others
Plaintiff:
R. Scott Walker
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01819
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Joel Rosenfeld IRA v. Datawatch Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv01819
Defendant:
Richard de J. Osborne, Datawatch Corporation, David C Mahoney and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Rosenfeld IRA
Mahony v. Franklin County Jail
as 4:2017cv05124
Plaintiff:
Allison Rae Mahony
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. Radhakrishnan et al
as 1:2017cv04077
Plaintiff:
Christopher A. Henry
Defendant:
Venkataraman Radhakrishnan, Joseph Freebern, David Abraham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reuben Lehmann v. USDC-IDB
as 17-70665
:
In re: REUBEN D. LEHMANN
Petitioner:
REUBEN D. LEHMANN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
KEVIN HARRIS, Officer #50899, DANIEL NORRIS, Pros. Attorney and MAHONY, Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv11604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Mahony v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv12518
Plaintiff:
Donna Mahony
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
