Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Apodaca v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00221
Defendant:
State Prosecutors, Christy May, Margaret Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Jaime Apodaca
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
David G. Scott
Defendant:
Margaret Moore and David Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00073
Plaintiff:
Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Margaret Moore and David Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ray
Defendant:
Margaret Moore and David Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2019cv24799
Plaintiff:
Rick Sorensen, Denis E. Pallas, David W. Cashatt and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Reposa v. Chody et al
as 1:2019cv01110
Plaintiff:
Adam T. Reposa
Defendant:
Robert Chody, Nicole Warren, Williamson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Coffman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 8:2019cv00446
Plaintiff:
Rick Sorensen, Denis E. Pallas, David W. Cashatt and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Borchardt v. Montford et al
as 1:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
Emily Borchardt
Defendant:
Margaret Moore, Melinda Montford and Travis County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv12626
Defendant:
NOVARTIS CONSUMER HEALTH INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARGARET MOORE
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Moore et al
as 1:2018cv00539
Defendant:
Margaret Moore and Velva L. Price
Plaintiff:
Jerel Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
