Cases 21 - 30 of 369
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. MELTON et al
as 1:2023cv00434
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MARSHALL E. MELTON and INTEGRATED CONSULTING & MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
GRIZZEL v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
PAMELA GRIZZEL
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, SURRY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, ABBY BISHOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Brown et al
as 5:2023ct03113
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Levon Jones
Defendant:
Ms. Brown, John Doe U.S. Marshal and Jane Doe U.S. Marshal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Pike et al
as 5:2023ct03052
Plaintiff:
Clarence E. Edwards
Defendant:
Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge, James D. Giggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Deja Mone't Moore
Defendant:
Marshall Williams, Robert Allen, Miranda Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. USA
as 1:2023cv00146
Petitioner:
THOMAS MARSHALL BYRD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TUCKER v. U.S. MARSHALS
as 1:2023cv00130
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEWIS TUCKER
Defendant:
U.S. MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Streeter v. Williams
as 3:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Faith Sherrie Streeter
Defendant:
Marshall Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shine v. U.S. Marshall
as 3:2023cv00035
Petitioner:
Kerry Shine
Respondent:
U.S. Marshall
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
