Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Center for Biological Diversity v. FWS, et al
as 23-5285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Secretary of the Interior
Tonawanda Seneca Nation v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 1:2023cv01236
Plaintiff:
Tonawanda Seneca Nation
Defendant:
Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, Thomas Roster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Center For Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
as 23-7785
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE, INC., WATERKEEPERS CHESAPEAKE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Interior
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv03343
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and APPALACHIAN VOICES
Defendant:
U.S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, GLENDA OWENS, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
Kansas Natural Resource Coalition et al v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 7:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
Kansas Natural Resource Coalition, Cameron Edwards, Lone Butte Farm, LLC and others
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, United States Department of Interior, Debra Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et al v. FWS, et al
as 23-5227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of Minnesota Scientific and Natural Areas
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and United States Department of the Interior
Center for Biological Diversity v. Haaland et al
as 2:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
Secretary Deb Haaland and Director Martha Williams
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE et al
as 1:2023cv02866
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant:
U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, DEBRA A. HAALAND, MARTHA WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 Endangered Species Act
The Institute for Regional Conservation et al v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 9:2023cv81257
Plaintiff:
The Institute for Regional Conservation, Center for Biological Diversity and NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Martha Williams and Deb Haaland
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1540 ESA - Endangered Species Act
Melone v. Coit, et al
as 23-1736
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS MELONE
Plaintiff:
ALLCO RENEWABLE ENERGY, LTD. and ALLCO FINANCE LTD
Defendant / Appellee:
JANET COIT, in her official capacity as Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, JANET COIT, in her official capacity of Assistant Administrator, National Marine Fisheries Service and others
Intervenor / Appellee:
VINEYARD WIND 1, LLC
Defendant:
DEBRA HAALAND, in her official capacity of Secretary of the Interior, JOHN A. ATILANO, II, Colonel, in his official capacity of Commander and District Engineer, MARTHA WILLIAMS, in her official capacity of Principal Deputy Director and others
Intervenor:
SOUTH FORK WIND, LLC
Interested Party:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
