Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Mooring v. USA
as 1:2016cv00437
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Melvin Mooring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOORE v. USA
as 1:2015cv00119
Petitioner:
MELVIN MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MOORE v. USA
as 1:2014cv00377
Petitioner:
MELVIN MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-51329
Plaintiff:
Melvin Moore , Sr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Moore v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 3:2013cv51329
Plaintiff:
Melvin Moore , Sr.
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Aldersgate Village et al
as 5:2013cv04083
Plaintiff:
Regina Moore and Melvin Moore
Defendant:
Aldersgate Village, Sarah Anderson, Michelle Schmale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Agnew v. Barnard Construction Company, Inc.
as 9:2012cv80161
Plaintiff:
John Agnew , David Adams, Derrick Bouie and others
Defendant:
Barnard Construction Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
David Adams, et al v. Barnard Construction Company
as 11-15914
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID ADAMS, JOHNNIE L. ADAMS, JOHN K. AGNEW and others
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD GRICE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARNARD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a foreign corporation licensed to do business in the State of Florida
Moore v. Conway
as 10-4648
Petitioner - Appellant:
Melvin Moore
Respondent - Appellee:
James T. Conway, Warden Attica Correctional Facility
MOORE V DVA
as 11-7004
Respondent-Appellee:
Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs and others
Claimant-Appellant:
Melvin Moore, Melvin Moore, Melvin Moore and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
