Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Kanode v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2012cv06068
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Kanode, Sr.
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety, Dennis W. Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Kanawha County Commission et al
as 2:2012cv01945
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Thompson
Defendant:
Kanawha County Commission , Kent Carper , Hoppy Shores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Pullen v. Lemaster et al
as 2:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
Charles Pullen
Defendant:
D. Lemaster, M. Wilson, N. Shultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramage v. Gerard et al
as 1:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
James Ramage
Defendant:
Gerard, Bearden, Capenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weese v. Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Weese
Defendant:
Central Regional Jail, Administrator Markle, Staff Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weese v. Central Regional Jail et al
as 2:2010cv01116
Plaintiff:
Jerry L. Weese
Defendant:
Central Regional Jail, Administrator Markle, Staff Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons et al v. Pilgrim et al
as 2:2009cv00121
Plaintiff:
David Simmons, David Simmons, David Simmons and others
Defendant:
Lonnie A. Pilgrim, Lonnie Ken Pilgrim, Clifford Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Gilmore v. Bloom et al.
as 2:2008cv00326
Plaintiff:
Boyd Gilmore
Defendant:
Louis H. Bloom, Rebecca Bostic, William Haines and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pettry v. W.Va. State et al.
as 2:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Wendell L. Pettry
Defendant:
W.Va. State, W. Va. Parole Board and Board Members
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Motto v. Rider et al
as 5:2007cv00627
Plaintiff:
Michael Motto
Defendant:
C. J. Rider, Thomas McBride, David Ballard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
