Cases 21 - 30 of 163
STATEN v. RANSOM et al
as 2:2020cv04454
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ABRAHAM, DONALD VAUGHN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHAEL FISHER and others
Petitioner:
HAROLD STATEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fisher v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv00209
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Fisher
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31458
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2020cv00258
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, City of Tulsa, Michael Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Yantis Cornelius Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12723
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chris Ann Jaye v. William Barr, et al
as 20-2073
Defendant / Appellee:
James C. Duff, John Does, 16-50, Yolanda Ciccone and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chris Ann Jaye
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv96222
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IAN MICHAEL FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93132
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MICHAEL FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv44473
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHASE MICHAEL FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AZUBUKO v. ZOBEL et al
as 1:2020cv10638
Defendant:
DENNIS MICHAEL FISHER, ROBERT BRUCE KING, JOSEPH F. WEIS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
Chukwuma E. Azubuko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
