Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Leslie Moore v. County of Butte, et al
as 11-18024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESLIE MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BUTTE, CITY OF CHICO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Arvanitis, et al v. MA DOC, et al
as 11-2203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW ARVANITIS and EDWARD JACOBS
Defendant - Appellee:
MA DEPT OF CORRECTION, MA HUMAN RESOURCES DIVISION, MA CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION and others
Finnamore et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2011cv06767
Plaintiff:
John Finnamore, Michael Maloney, Thomas Casatelli and others
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Maloney et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv12793
Plaintiff:
Tisha Maloney and Michael Maloney
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dyous v. Maloney
as 10-1936
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES DYOUS
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MALONEY
ROBERTS v. US AIRWAYS GROUP INC. et al
as 5:2010cv02236
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. ROBERTS
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS GROUP INC., MICHAEL MALONEY, DAVID KNOEDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
M. Paul Wehling et al v. Robert M. Costello et al
as 2:2010cv02923
Defendant:
John Bouzane, Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company, Michael J. Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Maloney and M. Paul Wehling
Moore v. County of Butte et al
as 2:2010cv00713
Defendant:
County of Butte, City of Chico, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Leslie Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Golston v. Maloney
as 09-2466
Petitioner - Appellant:
SIEGFRIED GOLSTON
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MALONEY
Moore v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2009cv02892
Plaintiff:
Leslie Moore
Defendant:
City of Chico, County of Butte, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
