Cases 21 - 30 of 591
Sciascia v. Paul Stine Chevrolet, Inc.
as 4:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Nicole Sciascia
Defendant:
Paul Stine Chevrolet, Inc. d/b/a Murray Motors Chevrolet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
SMITH v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2023cv03290
Plaintiff:
DENIYA NAKEIDRA SMITH
Defendant:
ANITA J. MURRAY and GRACIELA CHRISTLIEB
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PRIBANIC v. HIGHMARK HEALTH et al
as 2:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL C. PRIBANIC
Defendant:
HIGHMARK HEALTH, ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, JEFFERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PENTSAS v. TATE
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
VASILIOS PENTSAS
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, CHAD MURRAY and PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
VALLADARES v. MOTEL 6 et al
as 2:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
DYLAN VALLADARES
Defendant:
MOTEL 6 and KAREN MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HUGHSTON v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2023cv01898
Plaintiff:
KENJAH J. HUGHSTON
Defendant:
WARDEN SEAN P. MCGEE, ASSISTANT WARDEN THOMAS BERGER, BOARD OF INSPECTORS OF MCCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
