Cases 21 - 30 of 104
MCKEOWN v. DOJ et al
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIA MCKEOWN
Defendant:
DOJ, DOD, WHO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant:
Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
C.C. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv09199
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Inc. and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
C.C. v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00970
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK INC. and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Plaintiff:
C.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2142
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00936
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WELLS-REYES v. NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
as 1:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
NATALIE WELLS-REYES
Defendant:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
LANGLEY v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2022cv00732
Plaintiff:
DIANNA W. LANGLEY
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, GROUP SHORT TERM DISABILITY AND LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF NOVANT HEALTH, INC., PLAN NUMBER 502 and NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-ERISA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
