Cases 21 - 30 of 35
ANGEL et al v. MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2018cv00805
Defendant:
JOHN SPANE, CITY OF MOUNT AIRY, THOMAS JACKSON, DDS and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS DWAIN ANGEL and WYATT DWAIN ANGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Swanson v. Gaston County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2018cv00086
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Defendant:
Gaston County Sheriff's Department, Becky Cauthran, FNU Becton and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Carawan v. Perritt et al
as 5:2016ct03228
Plaintiff:
William C. Carawan, Jr.
Defendant:
Mr. Perritt, Larry Thompson, Mr. Hovis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson v. West et al
as 5:2016ct03182
Plaintiff:
Dizni Randy-Edward Pearson
Defendant:
Billy West, Kara Hodges, Alpha Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moody v. USA
as 1:2016cv00192
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Harry Nolan Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Schwab v. Condin et al
as 5:2015ct03299
Plaintiff:
Edward Schwab
Defendant:
Bernard P. Condin, Janelle M. Headen and Nolan L. Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HICKS v. MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ET AL
as 1:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
HICKS, WILLIAM ALFRED HICKS, JR. and BILLY HICKS
Defendant:
MOUNT AIRY-SURRY COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY, JOHN SPRINGTHORPE, DONALD L. HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
