Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 265
Styles v. Odum
as 4:2023cv00268
Petitioner: Derrick Styles
Respondent: Roy Odum
Not Classified By Court: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Carvallo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00084
Plaintiff: Orlando Smith
Defendant: Fernando Carvallo, PA Bolaji Aremu, Nurse West Joeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Odum
as 1:2023cv03870
Petitioner: Isaac Beasley
Respondent: Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clay v. Odum
as 1:2023cv02971
Petitioner: James Rashad Clay
Respondent: Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odums v. Hooper
as 23-30421
Petitioner / Appellant: Surcorey D. Odums
Respondent / Appellee: Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Ringold v. Odum
as 1:2023cv02759
Petitioner: Richard Terence Ringold
Respondent: Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WORTHEN v. YORK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff: JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Defendant: Officer YORK, HOCOMB, TAREL TODDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WORTHEN v. YORK et al
as 7:2023cv00067
Plaintiff: JACQUEZ WORTHEN
Defendant: YORK, HOCOMB, TAREL TODDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott et al v. Odum et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00043
Plaintiff: Derek Scott and The Estate of Robert D. Scott
Defendant: Roy Odum, Josh Wicker, Henry Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baez v. Odum
as 1:2023cv02179
Petitioner: Roberto Baez and Reberto Baez
Respondent: Deputy Warden Roy Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?