Cases 21 - 29 of 29
McCort v. State of Ohio et al
as 2:2019cv02931
Defendant:
Warden David W. Gray, Director, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Deputy Warden Clark Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Deano McCort
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Gray et al
as 2:2019cv02425
Defendant:
David Taylor, Patrick Haley, David Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Milous Brown
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Courchevel 1850 LLC v. Haley et al
as 1:2017cv00241
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) N.A., Patrick Haley, John Doe # 1 through John Doe # 12 and others
Plaintiff:
Courchevel 1850 LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
HALEY et al v. AMS SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv05645
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HALEY , MONIQUE ALBORNOZ , REGINA AMANKULOR and others
Defendant:
AMS SERVICING, LLC, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MELO et al v. AMS SERVICING, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01807
Plaintiff:
DENNIS F. MELO , MONIQUE ALBORNOZ , REGINA AMANKULOR and others
Defendant:
AMS SERVICING, LLC , BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Haley v. Terry et al
as 2:2011cv00155
Plaintiff:
Patrick Haley
Defendant:
Tam Terry, Judy Lopez, Ronda Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HALEY et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv35039
Plaintiff:
PATRICK HALEY , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
