Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Peterson v. Waterford
as 3:2021cv00332
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Peterson
Defendant:
Town of Waterford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jordan v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv00255
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jennifer Peterson, Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Cook et al
as 3:2020cv01902
Defendant:
Jesus Guadarrama, C. Cepelak, Nunez and others
Plaintiff:
David Yariel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schlosser v. Borkowski et al
as 3:2020cv01376
Defendant:
McMahon, Cheney, Borkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nordstrom v. McMahon et al
as 3:2020cv00904
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, Alan M. Wexler, Stuart U. Goldfarb and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Nordstrom
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Interested Party:
Melvyn Klein and Ryan Merholz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00781
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kooi v. McMahon et al
as 3:2020cv00743
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, Alan M. Wexler, Stuart U. Goldfarb and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Kooi
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Interested Party:
Ryan Merholz and Melvyn Klein
Staton et al v. Holzbach et al
as 3:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Patrick Carrol, Dennis P. McDonough, Sedensky, III and others
Plaintiff:
Terrell Staton and Ezra Staton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merholz et al v. McMahon et al
as 3:2020cv00557
Defendant:
Paul Levesque, Alan M. Wexler, Laureen Ong and others
Nominal Defendant:
World Wrestling Entertainment and World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein and Ryan Merholz
Schlosser v. Carter et al
as 3:2020cv00434
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Department of Correction, Chelsea and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Schlosser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
