Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Rolon et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv02548
Plaintiff:
Michael Hernandez, Kayla Rolon, Christopher Husary and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1 through 20, CITY OF NEW YORK, Sgt. Scott Haldeman and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. The Hartford et al
as 1:2021cv20175
Defendant:
The Miami-Dade County Board of County Commissioners, The Hartford, The Hartford Insuramce Company of the SouthEast and others
Plaintiff:
Sharlyn Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
People of the State of New York v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2021cv00322
Defendant:
Chief of Department Terence A. Monahan, Police Commissioner Dermot F. Shea, City Of New York and others
Plaintiff:
People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and People of The State of New York
Interested Party:
Sergeants Benevolent Association
Intervenor Defendant:
Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Detectives Endowment Association of New York City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sierra et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv10291
Plaintiff:
Alex Gutierrez, Samira Sierra, Amali Sierra and others
Defendant:
Dermot F. Shea, CITY OF NEW YORK, Mayor Bill de Blasio and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Police Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopes v. DeLeon et al
as 3:2020cv07758
Defendant:
Eloise Gomez Reyes, Robert Hertzberg, Eleni Kounalakis and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Lopes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Bell v. New York State Department of C
as 20-3525
Defendant / Appellee:
Tom Patnode, individually, in his official capacity and as a coconspirator; RCF Corrections Sergeant and NYSCOPBA union member, Jim Bleu, individually, in his official capacity and as a coconspirator; RCF Corrections Officer and local NYSCOPBA Union President (resigned), Terry Pike, individually, in his official capacity and as a coconspirator; RCF Corrections Officer and local NYSCOPBA Union President (resigned) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randy R. Bell
Uniformed Fire Officers Associ v. DeBlasio
as 20-3177
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Cynthia Brann, in her official capacity as the Commissioner of the New York City Department of Corrections, City of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Detectives' Endowment Association, Captains Endowment Association, Sergeants Benevolent Association and others
Intervenor:
Communities United for Police Reform
Uniformed Fire Officers Associ v. DeBlasio
as 20-2789
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lieutenants Benevolent Association, Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York, Captains Endowment Association and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Department, Civilian Complaint Review Board, Frederick Davie, in his official capacity as the Chair of the Civilian Complaint Review Board and others
Intervenor:
Communities United for Police Reform
Petitioner:
New York State Black, Puerto Rican, Hispanic & Asian Legislative Caucus, Syracuse Police Benevolent Association, Inc., Police Conference of New York, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rockland County Police Benevolent Association, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., LatinoJustice PRLDEF and others
Ojeda et al v. Mendez et al
as 1:2020cv03910
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rosa Torres Ojeda and Michael Angelo Ojeda
Defendant:
Zaki Isaac Tamir, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, Sylvia Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ojeda et al v. Mendez et al
as 2:2020cv01615
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rosa Torres Ojeda and Michael Angelo Ojeda
Defendant:
Zaki Isaac Tamir, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, Sylvia Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
