Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Banzi v. Fluke et al
as 4:2021cv04207
Petitioner:
Defed Banzi
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Richard A Sommers, Christy Serr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodraska v. Young et al
as 4:2021cv04120
Plaintiff:
Richard James Woodraska
Defendant:
Darin Young, Mike Leidholt, Jeremy Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Temple v. Langdeau et al
as 5:2021cv05036
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants, Jeremy Langdeau and Shawn Richards
Plaintiff:
Curtis Temple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Hermanek-Peck v. Spry et al
as 4:2021cv04034
Defendant:
Richard Spry and Susan Spry
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hermanek-Peck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whalen v. Oglala Sioux Tribe Executive Officers et al
as 5:2020cv05070
Defendant:
Oglala Sioux Tribe Executive Officers, Mason Big Crow, Chancy Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Cleone Whalen
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 437
Kenderdine v. Roslyn Elevator et al
as 1:2020cv01030
Plaintiff:
Vivian C. Kenderdine and Richard B. Kenderdine
Defendant:
Marcia R. Schmidt and Roslyn Elevator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Temple v. Langdeau et al
as 5:2020cv05068
Defendant:
Mike Carlow, Tony March, Jeremy Langdeau and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Temple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roedder v. Young et al
as 1:2020cv01021
Defendant:
Darin Young and Jason Ravnsborg
Petitioner:
Richard Keith Roedder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tripp v. Augustine et al
as 4:2020cv04116
Defendant:
John Benting, Richard Vestlie, Michael Leidhotl and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
