Cases 21 - 26 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2011cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Berman v. Liu et al
as 2:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Larry Berman
Defendant:
Paul Liu, F. William Sapp, Honorable Richard S. Sheward and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bank of America NA v. Great Northwest Restaurants, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv05201
Plaintiff:
Bank of America NA and Bank of America NA
Defendant:
Great Northwest Restaurants, Inc., Bal Global Finance, LLC, United States of America, Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Credit Managers Association of California v. Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00275
Plaintiff:
Credit Managers Association of California
Defendant:
Does and Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Suzeiris LLC et al v. Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc et al
as 3:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Suzeiris LLC, Suzeiris LLC, Suzeiris LLC and others
Defendant:
Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc, Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc, Rewards Network Establishment Services Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Federal Trade Commission v Universal Premium Services et al
as 2:2006cv00849
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and Seal
Defendant:
Universal Premium Services Inc, Consumer Reward Network Inc, Star Communications LLC and others
Petitioner:
First Regional Bank and Electronic Clearing House Inc
Appellant:
Brian Macgregor
Claimant:
United States of America
Special Master:
Lourdes G Baird
Receiver:
Robb Evans
Interested Party:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
DaimlerChrysler Financial Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
