Cases 21 - 30 of 82
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00441
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Sandra Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00426
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Kenneth Jones, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Riley et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00423
Plaintiff:
Tony Lee Smith
Defendant:
Bob Riley, Richard F. Allen, Terrance McDonnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00400
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Sylvester Nettles, A. Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joiner v. Allen et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00391
Plaintiff:
Henry Joiner
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Sandra Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Allen et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jimye Taylor
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen, Kenneth Jones and Steven Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Allen, et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2003cv01008
Plaintiff:
David Larry Nelson
Defendant:
Donal Campbell , Grantt Culliver and Richard F. Allen
Pecial_master:
David Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Allen (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Joseph B. Hooks
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Allen (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2010cv00262
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
