Cases 21 - 30 of 161
Michael Micolo v. D. Reyes, et al
as 20-16481
Defendant:
PAUL R. BABEU, Pinal County Sheriff, RUBAN LEOS, Pinal County Deputy Captain, SAL DANLEY, EMT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL CARMINE MICOLO
Defendant / Appellee:
D. REYES, Deputy Sheriff #1150 and STACY SHERWOOD, Pinal County Deputy
Mathis v. Davis et al
as 4:2020cv02680
Defendant:
Warden Richerson, L. Davis, K. Mott and others
Plaintiff:
Ferlando Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasco v. Warden Richerson
as 2:2020cv00177
Plaintiff:
Luis Velasco
Defendant:
Warden Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dudley v. Richerson et al
as 2:2020cv00167
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Defendant:
NFN Tovar, NFN Richerson and Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Killingsworth v. Warden Richerson
as 2:2020cv00142
Respondent:
Warden Richerson
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Killingsworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richerson v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Aundrea Culcalger, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Torris Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALLEYRAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv93120
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHERSON TALLEYRAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Janow et al
as 2:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Gene W Smith, Kendall T Richerson, Alfreda D Carreon and others
Plaintiff:
Leon Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeunesse, LLC v. Nanjing Joymain Science & Technology Development Co. et al.
as 1:2020cv00468
Defendant:
Zhou Xijan, Viiva, LLC, Tim Richerson and others
Plaintiff:
Jeunesse, LLC
Medina v. Richerson et al
as 2:2020cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jessie Medina
Defendant:
Joe Tovar and Kendall Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
