Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Horton v. Richerson et al
as 2:2024cv00509
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Horton
Defendant:
Kelly Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richerson v. Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Jacob Richerson
Defendant:
Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Edwards v. Richerson
as 23-10844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Stephen Anthoney Edwards
Defendant / Appellee:
Kendall T. Richerson, Trevin S. Mogilnicki and Brian J. Janow
Chatman v. Matthew et al
as 2:2023cv00971
Plaintiff:
Stanley Brent Chatman
Defendant:
T Matthew, R Brewter and R Richerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
David Lee Washington
Defendant:
Adam Gonzales, Joe Tovar, Floyd Keesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babb et al v. Tennessee Valley Authority
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Melody Babb, Deanna Fults and Mark Richerson
Defendant:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Sileoni v. Tewalt, et al.
as 1:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Tewalt, Richerson, Wessels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Richerson, et al.
as 1:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Richerson, Wessels, Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sileoni v. Richerson et al
as 1:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Sileoni
Defendant:
Richerson, Wessel and Tewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richerson v. United States Steel Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Max Richerson
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation and Ryan McGhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
