Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Newton v. Franklin County Regional Jail et al
as 3:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Deputy Jailer Benedict, Officer Ringer, Sgt. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Newton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Erwin et al
as 3:2018cv00843
Defendant:
Scott Jordan, Tim Forgy, Klayton Rodgers and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheatley v. Ford
as 5:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Michael Wheatley
Defendant:
Rodger Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Fletcher et al
as 2:2018cv00122
Defendant:
Sgt. Stokes, Officer John Doe #2, Lieutenant Fletcher and others
Plaintiff:
Rodger Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Daley
as 2:2018cv00055
Plaintiff:
Rodger Williams
Defendant:
James Daley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Sewell et al
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Rodger Williams
Defendant:
Robert Sewell, Eva Maria Hager, Police Officer Wiggins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
R&J Oil, LLC et al v. Rodgers et al
as 3:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
R&J Oil, LLC , Keith Wayne Johnson, II and Nikkoll Dawn Johnson
Defendant:
R.C. Rodgers, R&R Oil Plus, LLC and Elmer George
Counter_claimant:
Elmer George
Counter_defendant:
Keith Wayne Johnson, II , Nikkoll Dawn Johnson and R&J Oil, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Daley et al
as 2:2017cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rodger Williams
Defendant:
James Daley , Jennifer Hairsine, Southern Health Partners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2017cv00543
Plaintiff:
Robert Willis McKinney
Defendant:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, James Erwin, Gregory S. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
as 3:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Rodgers Ferguson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
