Cases 21 - 30 of 38
GOODSON v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2014cv00386
Plaintiff:
MICKEY LYNN GOODSON
Defendant:
MORRIS YOUNG, RODNEY MOORE and WILLIAM BUCKHALT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
SCONYERS et al v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
VASHOUN SCONYERS and LATONYA LEWIS
Defendant:
MORRIS YOUNG , RODNEY MOORE , JEFFREY STOWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Omari v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02324
Defendant:
Police Officer Rodney Moore and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Annas Omari
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv02999
Plaintiff:
Dianne Moore and Rodney Moore
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patrick Christian v. Rodney Moore
as 13-1367
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY MOORE, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., JAMES TOWNSEND and others
Christian v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00100
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr., James Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Patrick Christian v. James Townsend
as 12-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TOWNSEND, Property Manager, Monroe Hall, RODNEY MOORE, Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department, DANIEL E. BAILEY, JR., Sheriff, Mecklenburg County Sheriff Department and others
Christian v. Townsend et al
as 3:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
James Townsend, Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Patrick Christian v. James Townsend
as 11-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK O. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TOWNSEND, RODNEY MOORE, DANIEL E. BAILEY and others
Christian v. Townsend et al
as 3:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Christian
Defendant:
James Townsend, Rodney Moore, Daniel E. Bailey, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
