Cases 21 - 30 of 48
Gehring et al v. Seright et al
as 1:2015cv01015
Plaintiff:
Curt Gehring , Jeremy Haselhorst , Robert Haselhorst and others
Defendant:
Daniel Seright , Deb Seright , Dustin Seright and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McIntyre v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv01007
Plaintiff:
Roger R. McIntyre
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Driscoll et al
as 4:2014cv04146
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee and Mary Lee
Defendant:
William Driscoll , Greg Albrecht , William Albrecht and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mortensbak v. Butler et al
as 3:2013cv03026
Plaintiff:
David Roger Mortensbak
Defendant:
Nicholas Butler, Paul Wayne Smersrud, McManus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv03025
Plaintiff:
Margaret E. Rogers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Waldner v. James et al
as 4:2012cv04153
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Waldner
Defendant:
Timothy L. James, James Law, P.C. and James & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
King v. Kesse et al
as 4:2012cv04120
Plaintiff:
Roger B. King
Defendant:
Jess Kesse, Paul Schueth, Chip Schorder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy et al v. Lake County, South Dakota et al
as 4:2012cv04070
Plaintiff:
Jodi Roy and First Dakota National Bank
Defendant:
Lake County, South Dakota , Roger Hartman , Timothy Walburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sioux Steel Company v. Schorn et al
as 4:2012cv04019
Plaintiff:
Sioux Steel Company
Defendant:
Thomas Schorn and Roger Kooima
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Raymond v. State of South Dakota, et. al.
as 1:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Raymond
Defendant:
State of South Dakota, et. al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
