Cases 21 - 30 of 179
STROH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09897
Plaintiff:
RONALD JAMES STROH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ronald Madero v. Christine Luffey, et al
as 22-1705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD JAMES MADERO
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTINE LUFFEY, in her official capacity, TARRA PROVIDENT, HOMELESS CAT MANAGEMENT TEAM and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARY KAY GENTERT, HUMANE ANIMAL RESCUE, JAMIE WILSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Taylor
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00642
Plaintiff:
Ronald James
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Larkins v. Noeth
as 22-229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Larkins, AKA Ronald James Larkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Joseph Noeth
Willut v. Heuer
as 2:2021cv01147
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Willut
Defendant:
Nita Marie Heuer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONOGHUE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv59626
Plaintiff:
RONALD JAMES DONOGHUE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lamb v. Staples et al
as 4:2021cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ronald James Lamb, Jr
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Town of Fairfax, Krista Dawn Staples and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
