Cases 21 - 30 of 49
CANNON et al v. AUTOMONEY, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00877
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER TAYLOR, JULIA HARRISON, BRIAN BREVARD and others
Defendant:
AUTOMONEY, INC. and AUTOMONEY NORTH, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warner v. Rush Espresso Cafe, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Paul McConachy and Rush Espresso Cafe, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jersey Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
RUSH v. THE NRP GROUP LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00886
Defendant:
THE NRP GROUP LLC, NRP ALSTON MANAGEMENT, LLC, NRP PARTNERS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRA RUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSH v. COOPER
as 1:2018cv00784
Respondent:
ROY COOPER
Petitioner:
FRANK JAMAL RUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaitkueviene v. Syneos Health Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv00029
Defendant:
Alistair MacDonald, Syneos Health Inc., Gregory S Rush and others
Plaintiff:
EGL VAITKUVIEN and Egle Vaitkuviene
Petitioner:
El Paso Firemen & Policemen's Pension Fund, Jin Jiang and San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Bussie v. J-Pay et al
as 5:2018hc02006
Petitioner:
Anthony Bussie
Respondent:
J-Pay, Keefe, EZ Card and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rushing v. USA
as 3:2017cv00650
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Marie Rushing
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kelly v. Solomon et al
as 3:2017cv00311
Plaintiff:
Willie T. Kelly, Jr.
Defendant:
George T. Solomon, R. D. Mitchell, Alfred William and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers, et al v. Bradford Preparatory School, et al
as 3:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Romus Myers and Nikki Rush
Defendant:
Bradford Preparatory School , Kelly Painter and Jeff McManus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rush v. Kenneth Rust Enterprises et al
as 7:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Rush
Defendant:
Kenneth Rust Enterprises, Douglas Humpries, Michelle Nobles-Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
