Cases 21 - 30 of 114
THE ESTATE OF JOHN MARK HENDRICK, JR. v. BARTRUG, III et al
as 1:2020cv00778
Defendant:
MATTHEW JACOB SHELTON, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA and BARRY LEE BARTRUG, III
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOHN MARK HENDRICK, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWMAN v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00415
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY JAIL, B. COLE, CINDY FELTS and others
Plaintiff:
SHANE DOUGLAS BOWMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFITH v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY JENKINS, LT. RANDALL SHELTON, SURRY COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIPPS v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00221
Defendant:
SGT. RANDY JENKINS, LT. RANDALL SHELTON, SHERIFF STEVE HIATT and others
Plaintiff:
JERAMEY LIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIPPS v. SURRY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00207
Defendant:
SURRY COUNTY JAIL, SGT. RANDY JENKINS, CINDY FELTS and others
Plaintiff:
JERAMEY LIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soliz v. Shelton et al
as 5:2020ct03054
Defendant:
Eddy Shelton, Dale Childres, Armando Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Adame Soliz, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2019ct03334
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, Carmen Hendricks, Erik A. Hooks and others
Plaintiff:
Van Brett Pierre Watkins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TALBERT v. MARION et al
as 1:2019cv01100
Defendant:
TRACY DAILEY, SHELTON RODGERS, LARRY MARION and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN ROSS TALBERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KUHL v. SHELTON et al
as 1:2019cv00956
Defendant:
STEVE HIATT, DAVID ERDMANN, J. R. PALMER and others
Plaintiff:
THEODORE KUHL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHELTON v. TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
as 1:2019cv00443
Plaintiff:
DAWN SHELTON
Defendant:
TATE & KIRLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
