Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv03116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Willrich v. The United States et al
as 3:2013cv02670
Plaintiff:
Candace Willrich
Defendant:
The United States of America, U.S. Department of Justice, Susan Rice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEMPERT v. RICE et al
as 1:2012cv01518
Plaintiff:
DAVID H. LEMPERT
Defendant:
SUSAN RICE, UNITED NATIONS and UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Rice et al v. Bank of America, NA
as 0:2012cv02198
Plaintiff:
Susan Rice and Stephen Boggs
Defendant:
Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Rice v. Afni, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03132
Defendant:
Afni, Inc. and John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 10
Plaintiff:
Susan Rice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
AKERE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2011cv01015
Plaintiff:
MUBARAQ TOPE AKERE
Defendant:
BARACK H. OBAMA, UNITED STATES SENATE, US REPRESENTATIVES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice et al v. M.R.S. Associates, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03709
Defendant:
John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25 and M.R.S. Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Shari Kavalin, Elizabeth Meloskie and Susan Rice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rice et al v. NCO Financial Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03711
Defendant:
John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 10 and NCO Financial Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Rice and Susan Rice
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CREDICO v. OBAMA et al
as 2:2010cv03456
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, MICHAEL BERNARD MUKASEY, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARNER v. RICE
as 1:2009cv01723
Plaintiff:
R. LEE GARNER, JR
Defendant:
SUSAN RICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
