Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Parks v. Sabo et al
as 3:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Anthony Parks
Defendant:
C/O Sabo, Sgt. Cook, C/O Lazante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teen v. Lazante et al
as 3:2017cv00929
Plaintiff:
Antrell A. Teen
Defendant:
M. Lazante and Sgt. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teen v. St. Clair County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00594
Plaintiff:
Antrell A. Teen
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Philliph McLauren, Sgt. Boujack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Firestine et al v. St. Clair County Jail et al
as 3:2017cv00564
Plaintiff:
Anthony Firestine, Billy Seals, Montrae Hardy and others
Defendant:
St. Clair County Jail, Phillip McLauren, Sergeant Boujack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cardona v. Cook
as 14-4050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENE CARDONA
Defendant - Appellee:
SGT. COOK, Sergeant at the Central Utah Correctional Facility, individually; JOHN DOES 1-10, employees at the Utah State Prison,
Randy Fuewell v. Lt. Thompson
as 14-6100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDY MORRIS FUEWELL, a/k/a Randy M. Fuewell, a/k/a Randy Morris Furwell, a/k/a Randy M. Furwell
Defendant - Appellee:
LIEUTENANT THOMPSON, LT. DONALD GILCHRIST, DR. KOSHER and others
Defendant:
LT. WILLIE BRISCOE, SGT. COOK, IDA CULBREATH and others
Drew v. Dasen et al
as 2:2013cv03469
Plaintiff:
Ramone Karim Drew
Defendant:
Major Dasen, A Johnson, Sgt Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Breeland v. Sgt. Cook
as 3:2012cv02511
Plaintiff:
Joseph Breeland
Defendant:
Sgt. Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy M. Fuewell v. Lt. Thompson et al
as 4:2012cv01004
Plaintiff:
Randy Morris Fuewell
Defendant:
Lt Thompson, Willie Briscoe, Donald Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Sgt. Cook et al
as 0:2012cv60621
Plaintiff:
Leroy Johnson
Defendant:
Sgt. Cook and Collin Turnquest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
