Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,007
Gleicielle Da Silva Souza, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10543
Petitioner: GLEICIELLE DA SILVA SOUZA, RENAN DOS SANTOS ARAUJO and RYAN DA SILVA SANTOS ARAUJO
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Costa Souza v. Garland
as 24-408
Petitioner: MATHEUS COSTA SOUZA and LAURA CHAVES COSTA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00844
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01159
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
De Souza Silva, et al. v. Garland
as 24-834
Petitioner: SILVANA DE SOUZA SILVA, GLEIDSTON MAGNO ALVES and PABLO DE SOUZA ALVES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dos Santos-De Souza, et al. v. Garland
as 24-829
Petitioner: SIMONE DOS SANTOS-DE SOUZA and MARIA ANTONIA LIMA DOS SANTOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Souza v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv10208
Petitioner: Jeffrey A Souza
Respondent: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Souza v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 6:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: Everson B. Souza
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?