Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Frank Dippolito v. USA, et al
as 12-4446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Patton v. Melchiorre et al
as 3:2012cv01439
Plaintiff:
Eric Patton
Defendant:
Vicki Melchiorre, Kevin T. Kane, Mildred Weinstein and others
Miller v. Smriga et al
as 3:2012cv01095
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Miller
Defendant:
John C. Smriga, Kevin T. Kane, Juliana Waltersdorff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Njos v. Carney et al
as 3:2012cv01375
Plaintiff:
Scott Njos
Defendant:
Carney, Onua, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowacki v. Rogers et al
as 3:2011cv01830
Petitioner:
Michael J. Nowacki
Respondent:
Chase T. Rogers, George Jepsen, Kevin T. Kane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nowacki v. Malloy et al
as 3:2011cv01242
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Nowacki
Defendant:
Dannel Malloy, Andrew McDonald, Michael Lawlor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jake Vale v. Paul R St Pierre et al
as 8:2010cv01625
Defendant:
Hank Adler, Corinthian Colleges Inc, John M Dionisio and others
Plaintiff:
Jake Vale
In Re: Corinthian Colleges, Inc. Shareholder Derivative Litigation
as 8:2010cv01597
Defendant:
Hank Adler, Corinthian Colleges, Inc., DOES and others
Plaintiff:
David Realty Company
United States of America, et al v. Corinthain Colleges, et al
as 10-55037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., NYOKA LEE, AKA Seal 2 and TALALA MSHUJA, AKA Seal 3
Defendant - Appellee:
CORINTHAIN COLLEGES, AKA Seal A, ERNST & YOUNG LLP, AKA Seal B, DAVID MOORE, AKA Seal C and others
USA et., al v. Corinthian Colleges, Ernst & Young LLP. et., al.
as 2:2007cv01984
Defendant:
Corinthian Colleges, Does, Ernst & Young LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Nyoka Lee, Talala Mshuja and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
