Cases 21 - 30 of 84
Peterson v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv14559
Plaintiff:
Mary T. Peterson
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2016cv16387
Plaintiff:
Trenetta Z. Williams
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , Bryce T. Peterson , Susan S. Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 2:2016cv16381
Plaintiff:
Trenetta Z. Williams
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Bryce T. Peterson and John E. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Stanley
as 5:2016hc02101
Petitioner:
Jason T. Peterson
Respondent:
Drew Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peterson v. Costello et al
as 2:2016cv10420
Plaintiff:
Bradley T. Peterson
Defendant:
Joseph A. Costello, Jr. and Michael W. LaBeau
Peterson v. LaBeau et al
as 2:2016cv10419
Plaintiff:
Bradley T. Peterson
Defendant:
Michael W. LaBeau and Joseph A. Costello, Jr.
Peterson v. Clanton, et al
as 5:2016cv10353
Plaintiff:
Bradley T. Peterson
Defendant:
Daniel Clanton, Monroe, City of, Monroe Police Department and others
PETERSON v. JONES et al
as 8:2016cv00108
Petitioner:
Richard T. Peterson
Respondent:
Julie Jones and Shannon Varnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Competitive Enterprise Institu, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1488
Petitioner:
Competitive Enterprise Institute, Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, Independence Institute and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae For Petitioner:
Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia
Movant-Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
American Thoracic Society, American Medical Association, American College of Preventive Medicine and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
