Cases 21 - 30 of 967
Meadows et al v. Leeds, City of et al
as 2:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Frank Meadows and Quinton Leroy Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Leeds, City of, Thomas William McDonald, McWhorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Landendorf et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Roy Robert Landendorf, Cornell Knox, Shanti Koko and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals AMericas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Killings et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01718
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Lemuel Killings, Jr, James Harper, Raymond Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Smith v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eugene Smith
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. Hamm et al
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hood
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm and Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Terry v. Credence Resource Management LLC
as 5:2023cv01440
Plaintiff:
Melissa Terry
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Raybon
as 2:2023cv01433
Petitioner:
Bart Wayne Johnson
Respondent:
Terry Raybon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Catoe v. City of Sheffield Alabama et al
as 3:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
Will Catoe
Defendant:
City of Sheffield Alabama, Ricky Terry, Scott Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
