Cases 21 - 30 of 51
v. ROMANSKY et al
as 2:2009cv00745
Petitioner:
STEVEN L. ROMANSKY
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and DOUGLAS JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yancey et al vs. Corbett
as 3:2009cv00853
Plaintiff:
James Yancey, Rafael Colon, Ricky Roberts and others
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warrick v. Cameron et al
as 4:2009cv00684
Petitioner:
Roland T. Warrick
Respondent:
Kenneth Cameron and Thomas W. Corbett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Leonard v. McVey et al
as 1:2009cv00666
Plaintiff:
Michael Leonard
Defendant:
Catherine C. McVey, Michael L. Green, Jeffrey R. Imboden and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bricker v. Harlow et al
as 1:2009cv00582
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Bricker
Defendant:
Michael W. Harlow, Fred J. Ruffo, William Ayers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
YUNIK v. MCVEY et al
as 2:2008cv01706
Plaintiff:
JAY V. YUNIK
Defendant:
CATHERINE C. MCVEY, MICHAEL L. GREEN, JEFFREY R. IMBODEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Stilp v. Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission et al
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Gene Stilp
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission, John J. Contino and Thomas W. Corbett, Jr.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SUTTON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2009cv00052
Plaintiff:
HEATH LEE SUTTON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peterson v. Corbett et al
as 3:2008cv02292
Plaintiff:
Anita Peterson
Defendant:
Thomas W. Corbett, Jr., Kevin Colgan, Frank G. Fina and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRISHAM v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2008cv01539
Petitioner:
GEORGE GRISHAM
Respondent:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. and STEPHEN A. ZAPPALA, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
