Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 64
WILLIAMSON v. BUSKIRK
as 5:2012cv02722
Petitioner: MATTHEW WILLIAMSON
Respondent: TODD BUSKIRK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILLIAMSON v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2012cv02333
Plaintiff: MATTHEW WILLIAMSON
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, MICHAEL BATEMAN and TODD BUSKIRK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HITCHO v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2012cv01902
Plaintiff: GEORGE HITCHO
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, TODD BUSKIRK and MICHAL BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMSON v. HETHERMAN et al
as 5:2012cv01439
Defendant: BRENDON HETHERMAN, KEVIN DAVIS, CONRAD LAMONT and others
Plaintiff: MATTHEW ALLEN WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDRESEN v. COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv07582
Plaintiff: JON ANDRESEN
Defendant: COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON, ROBERT MEYERS, TODD BUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Damian Henry v. Todd Buskirk, et al
as 11-3930
Plaintiff - Appellant: DAMIAN HENRY, also known as James O'Neil
Defendant - Appellee: TODD BUSKIRK, BILL SWEENEY, MIKE BATEMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv03206
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MUCHA v. BOEHM et al
as 5:2011cv00624
Plaintiff: JOHN JULIUS MUCHA
Defendant: JAMES BOEHM , TODD BUSKIRK , WILLIAM SWEENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 5:2010cv05945
Plaintiff: ALLEN PETER BROWN, III
Defendant: NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON, TODD BUSKIRK and BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
XENOS v. MORAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv03586
Plaintiff: JOSE FREMONDE XENOS
Defendant: WILLIAM F. MORAN, NORTHAMPTON COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, TODD BUSKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?