Cases 21 - 30 of 46
Matthew Houston v. Joe Lombardo, et al
as 23-15067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, Sheriff, CAROLYN GOODMAN, MIRANDA M. DU and others
Matthew Houston v. Jerry Howell, et al
as 23-15059
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW HOUSTON and MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JERRY HOWELL, Warden, LT. CARLMAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Houston v. Bean et al
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Matthew Travis Houston
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Matthew Houston v. Calvin Johnson, et al
as 22-16902
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON
Respondent / Appellee:
CALVIN JOHNSON and UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies
as 1:2022cv03144
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 2:2022cv02168
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Productions, Encore Event Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Encore Event Technologies et al
as 1:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Encore Event Technologies, Encore Event Services, Freeman and others
Respondent:
Encore Productions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
