Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Hunt v. All Neo-Nazis
as 1:2013cv11321
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
All Neo-Nazis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hunt v. Kollar-Kotelly
as 1:2013cv11324
Defendant:
Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Hunt v. D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
as 1:2013cv11323
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
D.C. Metropolitan Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunt v. Chen, et al
as 13-1355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD M. CHEN and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Northern District of California
Tyrone Hurt v. Mitchell Goldberg, et al
as 13-15483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HURT, AKA Tyrone Hunt
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL C. GOLDBERG, United States District Court Judge and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Hunt v. State of Connecticut, et al
as 13-1324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF POLICE and NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
Hunt v. Chen et al
as 1:2013cv10197
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
Edward M. Chen and United States District Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hunt v. State of Connecticut et al
as 1:2012cv12401
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Police and National Rifle Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hunt v. United States Court of Appeals Circuit Judge Litsuy et al
as 8:2012cv03646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals Circuit Judge Litsuy, United States Court of Appeals Circuit Judge Rawlinion and United States Court of Appeals for the Northern District of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
